Monday, April 20, 2009

Hello, Ahmed? (Part 1)

.

If you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles.

If you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one.

If you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle.


- Sun Tzu




===================



[CRACKLE]

AHMED: Hello?

HABIB: Ahmed, my brother, have you heard?

AHMED: Heard what?

HABIB: About the CIA memos!!!

AHMED: No. What memos???

HABIB: Oh, my brother, Allah be praised… Obama has turned out to be the blessing that keeps on giving. He ordered the CIA to declassify and release memos outlining the types of interrogation methods they will and won’t use, and under what circumstances they have to legally stop them.


AHMED: Wait, didn’t Ayman and the boys already put quite a bit of this into the training manuals? I think it was right after the parts where our martyrs are instructed to falsely claim they were tortured --- even though they weren't, to gain sympathy of the infidels' news media and "human rights" organizations?

HABIB: Well, yes and no. We knew from some of our brothers who were released from Guantanamo what types of interrogation the infidels employ. But we didn't know the full scope of what they’re authorized to use, and most importantly, when they have to stop. For example, thanks to Obama, we learned that if a captured brother claims that he’s hallucinating, they have to shut down the interrogation. It’s all there, my brother, and it's glorious – I’m emailing you the links now.

AHMED: And what is the reaction among the American people, and their news media???

HABIB: [LAUGHS] Oh, my brother, it’s very funny, and consistent with their idiocy to date!!!

The American news media has circled the wagons around Obama, and is protecting him at every turn. They claim that it’s all part of America's “new approach” to foreign policy that he promised in his campaign. Releasing their own top-secret intelligence memos and their interrogation procedures and limitations!!! My brother, there isn’t enough money in all the oil fields of Saudi Arabia to buy that information – and yet, Obama just gave it to us for free.

As far as the American public goes, they’re distracted, as always. American Idol, Perez Hilton and all that nonsense. There are only pockets of resistance, trying to get the word out, but as their news media pays no attention to them, we have nothing to worry about. And their blogs... oh, their wonderful blogs. I'll send you the links to the commentaries on their deranged leftist blogs, The Huffington Post and Daily Kos... you'll be warmed by how outraged they are at the grade-school "torture" they employed on our martyrs... [LAUGHS].

Even those useful idiots at MoveOn.org has gotten into the game, producing commercials pushing for criminal penalties for monkey-faced Bush officials who ok'd these non-torture methods. But of course, they ignore what we do to infidel crusaders when we get a hold of them.
They don't know or care what torture really is. My brother, they actually think that if they don't get rough with our martyrs, we'll go easier on theirs!!! Oh, praise Allah for the stupidity of our enemies.

AHMED: Amazing!!! Praise Allah, all those little things we did to help Obama get elected sure have paid off!!! Remember the campaign phone banks we set up with our brothers in Hamas, making calls to American infidels on his behalf – and the American news media wouldn’t even cover it? All the illegal donations we helped direct to his campaign, including from Gaza, that their infidel journalists refused to expose? Oh, my brother, this has worked out better than we hoped.

HABIB: Indeed – and it gets even better!!!

AHMED: What? How?

HABIB: Oh, where do I begin. You know how Obama recently likened America's infidel bankers to suicide bombers with their fingers on their bomb vests... then ordered his Department of Infidel-Land Security to stop referring to what we do as "terrorism"... and [laughs] to instead refer to it as "man-caused disasters." He can't even call us terrorists!!! And now, he's ordered them to stop referring to their military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan as "wars" - instead, now they're to call them "overseas contingency operations"!!! The stupid infidels can't even name what they're doing, or fighting against. I mean, who saw those jewels coming???

Then last week, Obama sat in that conference with a motley crew of America-hating Hispanic tyrants, Chavez, Ortega and Castro. Ortega ranted for nearly an hour about America, and Obama sat there like a beaten puppy and took it, and didn't say a word in defense of America. All he did was ensure that they don't blame him for what they allege are the sins of America --- which, by his silence, he gave credence to.


Obama's worshippers claim he is so smart, yet he never once pointed out that for years, Chavez has been allowing Hezbollah to set up bases throughout Venezuela, and is now buddies with Ahmadinejad. Or that Hezbollah operatives, with funding from Iran, are immersing themselves in Hispanic culture, to avoid detection if they're caught at the U.S. border.

Obama never once pointed out that Ahmadinejad has threatened to deploy thousands of suicide bombers to create "man-caused disasters" [LAUGHS] at "precise locations in America" if it interferes in any way with Iran's nuclear weapons program. I mean, where do they think these thousands of martyrs will come from... San Francisco?

And neither Obama nor the stupid infidel American news media will connect these dots. They just sat there like lemmings, taking all the abuse that Chavez and Ortega dished out. But who are we to complain --- he is doing a marvelous job of keeping his stupid citizens unaware of the threat they're facing, right at their southern border.

AHMED: Oh, that is classic. And don't forget --- even though America is bankrupt, Obama will soon be giving nearly a billion U.S. taxpayer dollars to our brothers in Hamas. He tells his stupid citizens that it'll only go to "rebuild" Gaza [LAUGHS]. Every sane person in the world knows that the only thing America's money will be going to "rebuild" is Hamas's ability to fund more "man-caused disasters" against Israel and other infidels. But leave it to the American government and news media to pretend otherwise. Thanks, President Obama!!!


HABIB: [LAUGHS]

AHMED: Oh, and one last item of wonderful news... I'm forwarding you a link to an article outlining how Obama has been quietly giving preference to, and filling the ranks of his administration with our Islamist brothers... and how, of course, the stupid American news media is too afraid of our cries of "racism!" and "Islamophobia!" to cover it. Praise Allah, could we have even hoped for a stupider, more simpering enemy???

HABIB: Thank you, my brother... I shall look forward to reading this wonderful news.

AHMED: Oh by the way, hello people at NSA – we don’t even care if you’re recording this call… thanks to your stupid infidel electorate, your stupid apostate president won’t do anything! All we have to do is cry, "You’re invading our privacy rights!" and you will back down!!!


HABIB: [LAUGHS] Oh Ahmed, my brother, you are too much… Allah be praised, you have a good night.

AHMED: And you too, my brother. Allahu Akbar!!!

HABIB: Allahu Akbar, my brother!!!

[CLICK]

[CRACKLE]





Original materials are © Copyright 2009 by Expedio, and Expedio5x5.blogspot.com.
Publications and syndicators – contact expedio5x5@gmail.com.

.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Some Things To Think About The Next Time VP Biden Spouts Off On "Patriotism"

.
From National Review Online:

The history of Biden's earnings, and charitable contributions:

1998 Adjusted Gross Income $215,432 Charity donation $195
1999 Adjusted Gross Income $210,797 Charity donation $120
2000 Adjusted Gross Income $219,953 Charity donation $360
2001 Adjusted Gross Income $220,712 Charity donation $360
2002 Adjusted Gross Income $227,811 Charity donation $260
2003 Adjusted Gross Income $231,375 Charity donation $260
2004 Adjusted Gross Income $234,271 Charity donation $380
2005 Adjusted Gross Income $321,379 Charity donation $380
2006 Adjusted Gross Income $248,459 Charity donation $380
2007 Adjusted Gross Income $319,853 Charity donation $995
Total Adjusted Gross Income $2,450,042 Charity donation $3,690

Between 1998 and 2007, Biden made over $2.4 million, yet he donated only $3,700 --- or slightly over 1/100 of a single percent --- to charity.

Yet he has the audacity to claim that it's "patriotic" to pay higher taxes, so the Obama administration can redistribute more tax dollars to benefit their favorite charitable and welfare-state causes:


Democrats: They'll give you the shirt off your neighbor's back --- while keeping their own under lock and key.

Not that Biden is unique. In 2008, a detailed study was conducted by economics professor Arthur C. Brooks to determine whether liberals or conservatives gave more of their income to support charities.

Despite the fact that on average, liberals earn 6% more than conservatives, the latter gave far more to charities. Read George Will's superb article,
here.

..

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Hooray!!! Kim Jong-Il Wins Re-Election Thanks To Card-Check!!!

.
Oh, the glories of non-secret ballot elections, like those that the hard-left in America is pushing for, via the (Orwellian-named) "Employee Free Choice Act!!!"

Today, Kim Jong-Il was unanimously re-elected by members of the (Orwellian-named) Democratic People's Republic of Korea's parliament.

Not a single dissenting vote!!! What a rousing endorsement of Kim's compassionate, nuclear-tipped policy of mass starvation, murder, indoctrination, and global terror.


This message was brought to you as a hearty endorsement of "public" balloting, in which everyone gets to see who and what you vote for. Because as we all know, only selfish, running-dog, capitalist, warmongering, imperialist lackeys insist on secret ballots. Where's the glory in that???


Viva le Dear Leader!!! Viva le Psychopathic Revolution!!! Viva le Open Ballots!!!

.

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Obamanomics For The Layman (And The Consequences)

.
For the past five years, I’ve been earning $40,000 a year. But for all those years, I’ve been spending $60,000 a year.

How do I survive, running this $20,000 annual deficit? Well, I’ve been paying close attention to how the U.S. Congress runs our affairs, and I’ve learned some good lessons.

I make up the difference by borrowing $20,000 a year from Guido (right). My wife knows I’ve been borrowing to make up for this deficit, but she doesn’t know from whom, and she hasn’t asked too many questions (sort of like the majority of her fellow taxpayers).


What she also doesn’t know is that when it’s time to pay Guido, I’ve been borrowing money from Vinnie (left, a few years ago, when he was in... state care).

I also never told her that if I don’t find a way to pay them, I’m going to end up getting my legs broken, or worse.





Now, stuffy old traditional economists would say that I have do do one or more of the following four things to pay off my debts, and get myself out of this mess once and for all:

  • Increase my earnings

  • Cut my spending

  • Sell off some of my assets

  • Ask for charity

With the advent of Obamanomics™, however, I realized that I don’t need to do any of those things anymore!!! I explained it all to my wife.

Her response was... not what I expected. More on that later.

Basically, I told her that I’m going to
increase my spending to $100,000 a year. I’m going to devote this $60,000 deficit to things that will make us feel better about ourselves, and pave the way for higher potential future earnings for our kids and grandkids.


First, we're going to get aluminum siding for the house. Why should we have to live with unsightly peeling paint each year, and be humiliated in front of our neighbors? It will boost our self-esteem, and provide “stimulus” to local contractors --- especially union folks, who like me, voted for Obama.

Second, we’re going to get a new home theater system, and new computers for everyone in the house. After all, when the kids go over to their friends’ houses and see their all-new electronics, and all the new gaming and educational software that are available for them, it hurts their self-esteem, and makes them wonder, why can’t we too have the very best? It’s not fair!

Third, we’re going to donate a certain portion of this money to Obama-affiliated community organizations such as ACORN. They’re fighting for the “rights” of exploited citizens like me, but they can’t do it without donations. Remember, it's like Peggy Joseph said (below), with
the advent of Obamanomics™...
"...I won't have to worry about putting gas in my car, I won't have to worry about paying my mortgage... if I help him, he's gonna help me!!!"

And that's the way it will work with me donating to Obama-affiliated nonprofits, too.

Fourth, we’re going to get a new minivan, with all the goodies. Each time I or my wife has to drop off or pick up the kids from school, their friends’ homes and parties, they ask why we’re the only ones who aren’t driving the latest model. It hurts their social standing, and by getting a new minivan, they won’t feel so ostracized. Plus, this will also help to stimulate the economy.

Now at this point, you may be asking, as my wife did, “If you aren’t going to find a way to pay down our debt, how in the hell are you going to afford another $40,000 a year deficit, on top of the $20,000 deficit we can't afford now?”


Here comes the magic of
Obamanomics™, as I explained to my wife:

As the kids will be out of high school soon, and with all the self-esteem boosting efforts we’ll have undertaken, I figure their earning power should be out of this world. So while other kids are working at McDonalds or in low-wage labor, with Obamanomics™, ours should be able to pull down at least fifty or sixty grand a year part-time, a good part of which will go to paying off our debt.

Neither Guido nor Vinnie were confident in my projections.

So I signed a contract with them, legally obliging our kids and grandkids to pay whatever debt I don't pay off. That pacified them for a few weeks, until they actually met our kids. At that point, Guido predicted that my under-educated XBOX-freaks would never earn more than minimum wage, and that I'd have to do better --- or else.

I explained that this is precisely the social compact that our generation, via our Obamanomic™ government, will exact upon future generations, to pay for our excesses today... that our kids and grandkids will be taxed up the ying-yang to pay for what we're consuming now.

Vinnie and Guido said that inter-generational wealth-theft is "reprehensible." I was like, "Huh? You guys are loan-sharking gangsters... and you're telling me what's reprehensible? Yeah, right." They didn't find my attempt at humor to be funny.

So, I explained to my wife,
I’m going to tell Guido and Vinnie that all I really have to do is to print up dollar bills on the fancy new computers that I’ll be getting for the kids. They’ll be exact copies of the ones that I’ve been borrowing from one to pay to the other, and as no one will be able to tell the difference, they’ll be as good as the real deals!!!

After all, I said, five days after the Chinese government expressed concern about the $1 trillion in securities that it bought from the U.S. government, Obama ordered the Treasury to print up $1 trillion in fresh dollar bills. Basically, he just printed money up out of thin air. So, if it's good enough for our government, it has to be good enough for me, right?


Next, I told the wife, while old stuffy economists would say that I’m tripling our annual deficit, from $20,000 to $60,000 a year,
Obamanomics™ doesn't work that way. See, despite Guido's and Vinnie's pessimism, I still project that our kids’ earnings alone will actually enable me to cut our deficit in half within three years, to “only” $30,000 a year. When she pointed out that our deficit is actually growing by 50%, I reminded her of the fact that even though Obama is planning to triple America's annual deficit in the next three years, he claims that he'll be cutting it in half.


Further, no one we see on the TV news is saying there's anything wrong with his math, and our kids' teachers are saying nothing's wrong with his plan. So I asked her, why's she getting all in my face about this? I told her that according to my
Obamanomics™-inspired plan, I’m actually being fiscally responsible, and will be doing good for our family, and the economy in general, in the long run.

Besides,
I told her, it doesn’t really matter anyway – because by the time Guido and Vinnie catch on to any flaws in my grand plan, she and I will be long gone… so screw ‘em!!! Let them go try to collect the money from our kids, or grandkids!!!

I figured I’d share all this with her before I presented my plan to Guido and Vinnie, thinking that she’d leap into my arms, pepper me with kisses, and thank me for being the wise, inspired provider that she hoped she’d married.


Instead... her reaction was... well, look what she did to me:







The doctors tell me that I should be getting out of the hospital within five or six months.



And this, after all I tried to do to... I mean, for our family...




Epilogue

I’m going to be sending my medical bills directly to the White House, and cc’ing them to Congress.


After all,
Obamanomics™ is what got me, an innocent victim, into this mess, and I fully expect our public servants to get me out of it.

I think there’s a passage in the Constitution about that – something about “the general welfare”? I learned about that in the government-run school I went to. And even if there isn’t such a passage in that old, musty document, there damn well ought to be. Yes we can!!!



Original materials are © Copyright 2009 by Expedio, and Expedio5x5.blogspot.com.
Publications and syndicators – contact expedio5x5@gmail.com.
.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

American CEOs To Form Labor Union; Leftist Legal Group Vows Public Battle

The.
Chalk this essay up to a combination of wishful thinking, satire, and reaction to the sheer anti-freedom hysteria emanating from Washington, DC at the moment. When will America's corporate leaders finally stand up and join together, to fight back against those now forging our public policies, yet who'd be hard-pressed to judge whether al Qaeda or America's CEOs are more evil? Perhaps this might help serve as a catalyst for this outcome. - E.



March 25, 2009 – by Expedio


WASHINGTON, DC – Most Americans are aware of the prominent American legal organizations – the ABA, the ACLU and others. Some legal organizations, however, have kept a far lower profile – by design, until situations arose that required a significant amount of public exposure.


One example (covered at The People’s Cube, here) was “Spiritual Lawyers Against Natural Disasters” (“SLAND”), which filed an intergalactic class-action lawsuit against God. Specifically, the SLANDers alleged that by causing supposedly “natural” disasters such as volcanic eruptions, forest fires, earthquakes and climate change, God did far more harm to Earth's ecology than anything mankind has ever been accused of perpetrating.


Now, another legal organization that decided it must “come out” is “Leftist Lawyers for All That Is Right” (L-LATIR).

According to lead attorney Karla Marx, L-LATIR has existed for the past half-century, quietly providing legal advice and strategic counsel to groups intent on subverting America, free enterprise, economic liberty, and especially, our educational system. She explained L-LATIR's guiding principle as follows:
“Quite simply, if it doesn’t conform to the doctrines espoused by the world’s most celebrated collectivists and anti-capitalists, then L-LATIR’s going to fight it.”

Recently, Marx's contacts in the Obama administration notified her that American CEOs are quietly forming their own union – the “American Corporate Executives Union” (ACEU), to defend themselves against what they contend is the unfair demonization of their profession.

After a hurried board retreat, L-LATIR determined that the time is right for their secretive organization to come out of the shadows, and vigorously combat these CEOs – publicly.


“Who the hell are America’s CEOs to form their own union?” Marx asked, her twitching eyes glinting with rage. An activist for Mao during the 1960s (his pictures adorn the inside walls of her traveling office – a 1966 VW Microbus), Marx continued:
“On whole, American CEOs are the most greedy, incompetent, malevolent, destructive forces on the planet, and have been for a very long time.

"Along with their neocon masters, they’ve caused more human suffering, more wars, and more strife than any other group. They entertain and enrich themselves by conspiring to cause prices to spike, decline, and become unstable. They destroy the environment. They fight every advance in social policy that the American people support.

"These greedy, malicious, incompetent bastards plan to form their own union? Well, on behalf of all Americans, we at L-LATIR will fight them at every turn.”

The ACEU has authorized one of its members, the founder and chairwoman of a fast-growing technology firm in the Washington, DC area, to speak on its behalf. She chose to do so anonymously, as “Ms. T,” for now.

In a yet-to-be-released introductory video, Ms. T,
a slim, modestly-dressed executive who appears to be in her early thirties, read the following statement:
“My name isn’t important. What the ACEU has to say, however, is vitally important to the future of freedom and human progress.”

“For the better part of the last hundred years, almost every type of labor group in America has formed its own union. From poultry-workers to plumbers, from truck drivers to striptease dancers, and from basket-weavers to bread-bakers, Americans who work in specific occupations have organized to act on their members’ behalf, advance their groups’ interests, and be their public voices. Even public schoolteachers, who are government employees, have formed their own unions, which are now among the most powerful in America.

"There is only one group of workers that’s never formed its own union: America’s CEOs. More than any other labor group, it is CEOs who are now under incessant attack, particularly by the Obama administration, Democrats in Congress, and in our artistic, journalistic and educational institutions. It’s clear that the time is right for CEOs to finally form our own union, so that we may respond with one voice.


“So today, I am pleased to announce the organization of The American Corporate Executives’ Union, or ACEU. The purpose of this union will be to set the record straight on what we have accomplished, and how governmental interference in, and corruption of our industries is responsible for most of the inducements that led some chief executives to make incredibly stupid decisions.

"We’ve been silent and disorganized for too long. With the emergence of the ACEU, that silence ends today. We invite CEOs across America to join us in this effort. More details on our organization, and how other chief executives can become a part of it, will be announced in the near future. Thank you."

Through an intermediary, Expedio5x5 arranged an exclusive interview with Ms. T, which took place recently at a café in the metro DC area.


**********************


E5x5: Thanks for agreeing to this interview. Let’s start by asking this: Was the creation of the ACEU inspired by Atlas Shrugged, Ayn Rand’s manifesto on laissez-faire capitalism?


Absolutely. In her masterpiece, Ms. Rand painted a picture of America, and the world, that is quite close to where we are today – at the precipice between freedom and tyranny. The premise of the book, as noted recently by Stephen Moore in the Wall Street Journal, was: what would happen to the world if those upon whom its survival is most dependent – its most able, productive and efficient business and industrial leaders – simply disappeared, by their own volition? Specifically, if they went on strike?


What would happen is: the world would decay and starve, and would continue to do so, until and unless it learned to appreciate their value, started respecting their rights, and stopped vilifying, enslaving and stealing from them. Although the ACEU doesn’t think we’re at that stage yet, there’s no question that if Obama and his allies, including L-LATIR – and even some on the “right” – keep pressing on with their collectivist programs, an ACEU strike may be the only option we have left.

In fact, many don’t know that the original title for Atlas Shrugged was ‘The Strike.’ We hope it doesn’t get to that point. This is our effort to avert it.



E5x5: How do you respond to those who say that American CEOs are deserving of all the public wrath and government policies that are now directed at them?


I vehemently disagree. Look around you. We are living in the most prosperous culture that the world has ever known. Where did it come from? First and foremost, it is the result of the American system of limited government, of property rights, of economic liberty, and of the rule of law. From this foundation, the world underwent the most radical transformation in all of mankind's history.

From iPods to the Internet, from microwave ovens to television, from our cutting-edge healthcare technologies to the autos we drive, and from the computers we work with and the machines that do so much of our labor, every one of these values can be traced back to an idea --- an idea that was developed, perfected and made marketable by innovators in business and industry, all of which were led by corporate executives.

Does this mean that it is only American corporate executives that are responsible for all these life-enhancing, life-saving, and life-extending products? Absolutely not. Great ideas have come from all points on the globe. But why is it that these innovators have chosen one place to come to, to develop, commercialize and profit from their ideas --- America --- more than any other? It is because of the culture our Founders created, that protects and nurtures them, and enables them to go as far as their talent and ambition can take them, so long as they don't violate the natural rights of others, in the process.

Yet there has been a fundamental contradiction, that's given rise to the rage and wrath that you cite. It is a contradiction that is destroying everything our Founders fought for, and which our predecessors accomplished.

For generations, we’ve allowed our schoolchildren to be indoctrinated – at taxpayer expense – in Marxist ideology. They’ve been taught, in nearly hermetically-sealed, taxpayer-provided environments called "public schools," to be suspicious of or hate those who create, who lead, who devise breakthroughs in technology, in manufacturing, and in management. Those who defend their right to innovate, and to enjoy the fruits of their labors, specifically the wealth and property that they earn, are targeted for special scorn.

In these Marxist "madrassas," we've allowed our children to be taught to believe that one of government’s moral functions is to shackle and control this ‘bourgeois’ class, both individually and collectively, and make them pay a very steep, ever-increasing price for the supposed ‘privilege’ of pursuing their dreams, and for creating the very jobs that our government says are so desperately needed today. Those children, having heard no alternative view (or at best, diluted, weak-kneed ones), had practically no choice but to accept these liberty- and progress-destroying premises.


Well, those schoolchildren have grown up, and they now occupy the highest seats of power in our government, and in Marxist front groups such as ACORN, Media Matters for America, MoveOn.org and L-LATIR, and hundreds of ‘community organizations.’ And make no mistake – they are deadly serious about implementing all the policies they’ve advertised – and others, which they have only hinted at.



E5x5: Do you believe that given such contrary views, the ACEU might be accused of fomenting conspiracy theories?


What I say could hardly be considered a "conspiracy theory." The conspiracy is very real, but it's so widespread, yet so loosely organized, that it’s difficult to comprehend its true scale.

Consider this: In 1987, 45% of American adults believed that Marx’s central principle in The Communist Manifesto, “From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs,” is contained within the U.S. Constitution – or didn’t know whether it is or isn’t (Hearst Foundation).

By 2002, that number had grown to 69% (Columbia Law School). Think about that. Today, nearly seven in ten U.S. adults, a 53% increase in 15 years, now believes (or doesn’t know if) the ideological foundation for communism
which is responsible for the deaths of an estimated 100 million people in the 20th century (Black Book of Communism; Freedom House) is contained in our Constitution.

Can any reasonable person really believe that this could have happened by accident? This is a fact that should send shivers down the spine of every liberty-loving American. But almost none of them know about it, because of a second conspiracy: the conspiracy of silence among our educators, politicians, journalists and artists. They will neither acknowledge nor discuss the fact that we've allowed our schools to turn into Marxist indoctrination centers.


Then, you take into account that nearly a quarter of Americans now believe that the First Amendment gives them the right to drive a car, to raise pets, or for women to vote (McCormick Tribune Freedom Foundation) –
that 80% of seniors at America's top universities will be able to graduate without having taken a single history class of any kind, and that most cannot pass a basic high school test in U.S. history (U.S. Dept. of Education) that a third of them are deemed "clueless" about the separation of powers in our government (American Council of Trustees & Alumni) – that by a 22-1 margin, our 8-18 year-olds believe government has done more "to make the world a better place for children" than corporations (Harris) and you have the makings for a complete abandonment of every principle of liberty and limited government that our Constitution actually contains.

Most recently, more than 3,000 college professors signed a statement of support for former Obama colleague William Ayers, an unrepentant domestic terrorist and unapologetic advocate of Marxist doctrine – and a "distinguished professor of education" at the University of Chicago. Can all this really happen by coincidence?


These are well-documented, indisputable, but little-know facts. As is the fact that the teachers' unions, which enjoy almost unrivaled power today in American politics, were a vital force in foisting Obama into the presidency, and his cronies into positions of leadership in Congress.

Why do you think that, despite their abhorrent subversion of freedom in America, and the fact that real education spending in America nearly doubled in the last eight years, the collectivist educrats' allies in the White House and Congress are so hell-bent on providing them with even more funding, and more legal protection from those advocating educational freedom/school choice? It is the ultimate symbiotic co-dependency, whose ultimate aim, or at least logical result, can only be the total collapse of America – starting with the economy, which, along with freedom, they’ve now all but declared war upon.



E5x5: Are you suggesting that our teachers' unions and government bureaucrats are responsible for America's financial situation?

I'm not suggesting it, I'm stating as a fact: It could not have happened without them.

Let's go back to the basics. If a business makes bad decisions, it ceases to exist. But what could bring an entire nation to its economic knees, except for a government that has injected itself into every aspect of its economy? I'm not even talking about the non-governmental vultures that aided and abetted it in this effort (think ACORN, and certain CEOs), but the ACEU will, soon.

Our schools are all but totally dominated by government, at all levels. These schools, therefore, are primarily responsible for the moral values and public policy perceptions that their charges --- the children who are forced to attend them --- carry forth into their adult lives.

What other force but our schools could have fomented the idea that a legitimate function of government is to force or intimidate financial institutions to make loans to those who can’t pay them back --- including illegal immigrants (whom they refer to as "undocumented workers")? To create government agencies that use taxpayer money to then buy up these bad loans – then "repackage" and sell them off to pension funds, institutional investors and foreign governments? To manipulate interest rates and use federal and local laws to choke off the supply of developable land, to drive the cost of housing through the roof? And then, to convince the majority of citizens, which they’d intellectually disarmed, that this entire financial house of cards is the responsibility of CEOs, because some got into bed with these bureaucratic fascists, and took advantage of this feeding frenzy?


And when it all came crashing to the ground, as we warned would happen, who did they blame? America's CEOs, en masse. And many innocent Americans, having been indoctrinated to viscerally hate CEOs, bought into it.

This doesn't even take into account Hollywood's near-monolithic effort to foment and reinforce CEO-hatred. We'll discuss that later, if you wish.

Now, these bureaucrats and their educrat allies are set on more fully controlling our businesses.

Setting aside the issue of ownership, does anyone but the most strident Marxist really believe that the bureaucrats who are now thirsting for, and getting increasing control over our companies, could run them better than us? That Barack Obama, who’s never successfully run so much as an ice cream stand, could run a factory, a software firm, or a chain of cafes better than their CEOs? That Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi or Barney Frank could deal with the daily struggles that American CEOs face, more effectively than we do, and generate profits – which is what creates the very jobs that they say our economy needs more of?

If so, then let us know, and we’ll turn over the keys to our enterprises to them, and walk away. Then, the American people will get an object lesson in why the fascist economic policies their political leaders have been pursuing always lead to destruction.



E5x5: You say that President Obama has never successfully run a business enterprise. But wasn’t he the president of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, a $50 million nonprofit?


I’m glad you asked that. Do you know how he got that job? The primary factor was William Ayers. The supposed purpose of the CAC was to improve education in Chicago-area schools. The actual purpose, according to Ayers himself, was to transform teachers and students into activists for Marxist ideology. (More here, here, here, here, here, here)

So how did it turn out? Obama and Ayers burned through that $50 million, and there was absolutely no improvement in education. In fact, according to some accounts, student achievement actually declined (details here and elsewhere). Like I said, our new president, no matter how likable a fellow he may be, has never successfully run so much as an ice cream stand.


Moving on, do you find it as curious as the ACEU does that while our political leaders decry CEOs for earning good livings, they’re silent when a 19-year-old singer rakes in $20 million a year, churning out vulgar lyrics? Or when an actors are routinely paid $10 million for 8 weeks on a movie set? Or when athletes who can move a ball over a goal line, or dunk a basketball, are paid $30 million or more each year?

Of course not – because they aren’t derided as evil, greedy, America-destroying CEOs. No, these are individuals – and are supposedly entitled to earn as much as the market will provide them.


The basis of discrimination and prejudice is the disparagement of an entire group based on the actions of, or the perception of, some of its constituent members. Whether the victims are all of one race, gender, ethnicity or religion – or occupation – it is always wrong, and always destructive.

Yet today, there is one group that has been discriminated against more than any other, which has, thus far, refused to fight back, on moral grounds – American CEOs. If our economy is to recover, it is upon the shoulders of these very CEOs that it will happen – through their ability, ingenuity, integrity, and most of all, their cherishing of American liberty.

The vast majority of us have taken this abuse and discrimination in silence, and soldiered on, creating wealth and jobs, all the things that our lives depend upon, and that make our lives better, easier and more productive.


Well, that silence ends today. Today, through the ACEU, we will begin to fight back – for ourselves, for America, and for the entire moral concept of liberty, upon which our Constitution is based.



**********************

When Expedio5x5 played an audio recording of the above for Ms. Marx, she dismissed it as "more of the same lies, fear-mongering and propaganda that shameless capitalists have been employing for decades." Ms. Marx continued:
“Ms. T, whoever she is, is obviously nothing more than the newest shill for the very forces that have brought America to her knees. Her outdated notions of the purpose of government, of what ‘community organizers’ do, her conspiracy theories about our hard-working teachers’ unions, are all part and parcel of the greedy, self-serving ideology that thankfully, President Obama and our Democratic leaders in Congress, are going to quash, once and for all.

"The workers of this nation produce its wealth.
Was it too much to ask that the government help these working Americans, and undocumented immigrants, to own their own homes? To provide their children with free educations? To advance modern values such as sacrifice, submission to government control over one’s life, bank account, health, and all our economic decisions? Look at all the advanced cultures in Europe, the Far East and elsewhere. They are the ones we should be modeling ourselves after. And by electing Barack Obama, we’ve gone a long way towards achieving that end.

“We at L-LATIR have been fighting miscreants such as ‘Ms. T’ and her greedy allies for decades, in and out of the courtroom. We know how to fight – and how to win. And if ‘Ms. T’ and those she represents want a fight in public, I can assure her, that’s exactly what they’re going to get.”

Asked for a response, Ms. T said the following, which she insisted on being quoted verbatim:

“Bring it, you Stalinist bitch. But know this: If you plan on pulling any of your ACORN-type stunts, of flash-mobbing protests at the homes of ACEU members to intimidate them into silence, or of barging into our boardrooms to disrupt our work, I will personally throw you out on your skank ass.”

Stay tuned for updates on this fascinating public brawl as it develops.




Original materials are © Copyright 2009 by Expedio, and Expedio5x5.blogspot.com.
Publications and syndicators – contact expedio5x5@gmail.com.


.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

"Butt Tree"

.


Taken March 7, 2009 with a Sanyo Katana Deluxe 1.2mp cellphone.



© Copyright 2009 by Expedio, and Expedio5x5.blogspot.com. All rights reserved.

.

Oh, Comrade: John Kerry Spouts Off On Fiscal Responsibility

.
On March 6, Sen. John Kerry wrote an editorial for Bloomberg News, here, in which he asserted that he, and those who think like him, are the ones who are looking out for the taxpayer --- whereas many of the financial institutions receiving taxpayer money for "bailouts" are being irresponsible. Specifically, Kerry alleges that they are "wast(ing) money on lavish parties, expensive dinners and Tiffany trinkets." More:
"I believe we have to insist that tax dollars be spent wisely because, otherwise, Americans will refuse to rescue any business struggling in the most difficult economic times since the Great Depression. And believe me, Americans struggling to hold onto their homes and their jobs are already tired of picking up the newspaper and reading about idiotic abuses of taxpayer money.(...)

"We should be focused on turning the economy around. We have to face the reality that huge swaths of our banking system are insolvent. We must recapitalize banks, not to help shareholders, but to rescue our economy. We need a clear, concise plan for aiding banks, large and small, that have liabilities that exceed their assets."
Golly. If it weren't so ludicrous for Kerry to be claiming that he (and Democrats) are taxpayers' friends, it would be funny. But the economic situation we now face --- and that which is looming right around the corner --- is anything but funny. And although Republicans have certainly been no friend to the taxpayer in recent years, for any long-serving Democrat to claim the mantle of "responsibility" is truly a joke. Let's look at the record.

According to the president and CEO of the Dallas Federal Reserve in a March 2008
address --- long before the TARP spending, the stimulus bills, the bailouts over the last 6 months --- Americans were facing $99.2 trillion in unfunded liabilities for Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, or $330,000 for every man, woman and child in the USA, today.

Congress writes all spending legislation. Democrats have been in control of the House of Representatives and the Senate for
the vast majority of the time that these entitlement programs were enacted, to the present day. Democrats were the ones that ushered in the age of "raiding" the "trust funds" that were set up for these programs. David Kelley wrote a good history of the Social Security myth, here.

John Kerry has served as a U.S. Senator since 1985 --- so he is intimately familiar with the fact that during his tenure, the U.S. went from a creditor nation to a debtor nation.

We are now borrowing many hundreds of billions of dollars a year from China and other nations to stave off complete national bankruptcy, while shifting the bill to pay all this money back, and continue funding these welfare schemes, to generations of Americans yet unborn.


Were the U.S. a private corporation, every one of the legislators that voted to put us into this giant, Ponzi-like financial mess would be brought up on criminal charges.
But because of the endless spin and propaganda of welfare-state cretins like Kerry, we're spending ourselves into oblivion all under the aegis of "helping" people, and preserving our "safety net."

What happens when foreign nations stop loaning us money? What happens when China decides it's had enough, and that it is militarily and economically strong enough to starve us? What then, Sen. Kerry?


Oh, right, I forgot --- you and Teresa (
"shove it") Heinz-Kerry can go ride off into the sunset, courtesy of her inherited millions, and leave the entire house of financial cards you helped to create for America to come tumbling down on our heads.

"Responsibility," indeed, Sen. Kerry.

"Shove it,"
yourself, Sen. Kerry --- and that goes the same for all the donkeys that you and your comrades rode in on.

* * *

NOTE: From the wayback machine.... Communists For Kerry.


Original materials are © Copyright 2009 by Expedio, and Expedio5x5.blogspot.com. All rights reserved.
Publications and syndicators – contact expedio5x5@gmail.com. .
.